Sylvester's Forgotten Form of the Resultant
نویسنده
چکیده
It is well known that Euclid's algorithm for computing the greatest common divisor (gcd) of two integer numbers is more than two thousand years old and, as it turns out, it is the oldest known algorithm. Interest in computing a gcd of two polynomials first appeared only in the sixteenth century and the problem was solved by Simon Stevin [13] simply by applying Euclid's algorithm (for integers) to polynomials with integer coefficients. However, from the computational point of view, Euclid's algorithm applied to polynomials with integer coefficients is very inefficient because of the growth of coefficients that takes place and the eventual slowdown of computations. This growth of coefficients is due to the fact that the ring Z[x] is not a Euclidean domain, and hence, divisions (as we know them) cannot always be performed. For example, take the two polynomials px(x) = x -7x4-7 andp2(x) = 3x 7 which have very small coefficients. Observe that, over the integers, we cannot divide px(x) hyp2(x) (since 3 does not divide 1) and, hence, we have to introduce the concept of pseudo-division, which always yields a pseudo-quotient and pseudo-remainder. According to this process, we have to premultiply Pi(x) by the leading coefficient of p2(x) raised to the power 2 [that is, we premultiply Pi() by 9 = 3] and then apply our usual polynomial division algorithm. [Below we denote the leading coefficient (1c) of a polynomial p(x) by lc(p(x)) and its degree by deg(j?(x)).] In the general case where deg(pl(x)) = n, and deg(p2(x)) ~m, we premultiply px{x) by lc(p2(x))~. In this was we know for sure that all the polynomial divisions involved in the process of computing a greatest common divisor of px{x) and p2(x) will be carried out in Z[x]. That is, in general, we start with
منابع مشابه
On Fisher's information matrix of ARMA process and Sylvester's resultant matrix
We consider two relations between Fisher's information matrix of a stationary ARMA (autoregressive moving average) process and Sylvester's resultant matrix. One is based on the Wald test statistic for testing common roots of the AR and MA polynomials of an ARMA process, and the other one is established by using the structure of Fisher's information matrix. It turns out that the latter is also a...
متن کاملThe Block Structure of Three Dixon Resultants and Their Accompanying Transformation Matrices
Dixon 1908] introduces three distinct determinant formulations for the resultant of three bivariate polynomials of bidegree (m; n). The rst technique applies Sylvester's dialytic method to construct the resultant as the determinant of a matrix of order 6mn. The second approach uses Cayley's determinant device to form a more compact representation for the resultant as the determinant of a matrix...
متن کاملHybrid Dixon Resultants
Dixon 1908] describes three distinct homogeneous determinant representations for the resultant of three bivariate polynomials of bidegree (m; n). These Dixon resultants are the determinants of matrices of orders 6mn, 3mn and 2mn, and the entries of these matrices are respectively homogeneous of degrees 1, 2, and 3 in the coeecients of the original three polynomial equations. Here we mix and mat...
متن کاملA generalization of Sylvester's identity
We consider a new generalization of Euler's and Sylvester's identities for partitions. Our proof is based on an explicit bijection.
متن کاملA Generalized Sylvester Identity and Fraction-free Random Gaussian Elimination
Sylvester's identity is a well-known identity which can be used to prove that certain Gaussian elimination algorithms are fraction-free. In this paper we will generalize Sylvester's identity and use it to prove that certain random Gaussian elimination algorithms are fraction-free. This can be used to yield fraction-free algorithms for solving Ax = b (x 0) and for the simplex method in linear pr...
متن کامل